Sustained Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus View PDF

*Neelima Dandamudi
Department Of Pharmaceutical Analysis And Quality Assurance, Annamacharya College Of Pharmacy, JNT University, Anantapur, India

*Corresponding Author:
Neelima Dandamudi
Department Of Pharmaceutical Analysis And Quality Assurance, Annamacharya College Of Pharmacy, JNT University, Anantapur, India
Email:neelimadandamudi@gmail.com

Published on: 2022-12-10

Abstract

In individuals with Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (IDDM), comprehensive diabetes treatment decreases the course of retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy, according to the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). The daily treatment of IDDM is challenging, and since the development of insulin therapy, the highest rates of morbidity and death have been associated with chronic metabolic decompensation and its long-term consequences, such as retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, and cardiovascular disease.

Keywords

Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Control and Complications Trial; Insulin Therapy; Albuminuria

Introduction

In individuals with Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (IDDM), comprehensive diabetes treatment decreases the course of retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy, according to the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). The daily treatment of IDDM is challenging, and since the development of insulin therapy, the highest rates of morbidity and death have been associated with chronic metabolic decompensation and its long-term consequences, such as retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, and cardiovascular disease [1,2]. Recent studies demonstrating the advantages of intensive diabetes therapy to prevent and decrease the evolution of retinopathy and nephropathy in individuals with type 1 diabetes have as their primary objectives the prevention and improvement of these problems. A multinational, randomized study called the Mellitus Regulation and Consequences Study contrasted standard diabetes with intensive care to determine which had a greater impact on the start and progression of IDDM’s early vascular and neurological complications as well as the therapeutic exposure needed to produce such changes [3,4].
The DCCT critical care arms were exposed to the two distinct glucose levels for an average of 6.5 years, depending on whether they had clinically obvious issues or simply early microvascular complications. The intensive care program was created so that blood sugar levels may be brought to normal using three or more daily insulin injections or treatment with an insulin device, as close to regular as is practical. In subgroups defined by baseline factors such as age, duration of diabetes, baseline HbAIC, level of retinopathy, existence or nonappearance of neuropathy, and hyperfiltration, the positive effect of emergency surgery on the development of microalbuminuria was consistent. This sustained positive effect of emergency surgery may inhibit or at least slow the progression of nephrotic syndrome and may delay or prevent advanced kidney disease in IDDM patients. The DCCT was a 29-center, randomized clinical trial that examined the effects of intensive diabetes management, which aimed to achieve blood glucose levels as close to normal as possible, and standard diabetes management on the onset and progression of long-term diabetes. Complications of IDDM, requiring one or two daily insulin injections.

Methods

The problem and the recommended course of treatment were explained to the patient and doctor. Treatment was planned after descriptions of the DCCT participants’ eligibility requirements, intensive and conventional treatment regimens, baseline renal function measurements, and renal function measurements during the DCCT. They were normotensive (blood pressure, 10/90 mmHg), had normal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) readings, and had no advanced microor macrovascular consequences of diabetes. The main preventive cohort’s albumin excretion rate was less than 28 g/min, while the subsequent intervention cohort’s albumin excretion rate was lower for durations of 1–15 years and at least 1 microaneurysm. Once the DCCT finished their report in 1993, 1,375 of the 1,428 remained. 1349 patients were enrolled in the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) trial as described by the remaining members of the initial DCCT cohort, including 688 patients from the prior conventional care group and 687 from the previous intensive care group. 12 of whom passed away after EDIC but before year 7, and 1337 of whom had a 4-hour urine collection or had their serum creatinine tested at year 7 or year 8. In the EDIC trial, HbA1c levels were determined by redox reactions using high-performance liquid chromatography and yearly blood pressure readings by sphygmomanometer. The average of the most recent and prior yearly readings served as the current mean HbA1c level for the EDIC trial. The average of all quarterly readings served as the mean HbA1c level during the DCCT. Age requirements between 13 and 39 years old, lack of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or severe diabetes complications or diseases, and insulin dependency as demonstrated by insufficient C-peptide production were important inclusion criteria [5-7]. Patients with IDDM for 1 to 15 years, very mild to moderate no proliferative retinopathy [4, 8], and urine albumin excretion < 200 mg within 24 hours were required to meet the criteria for the secondary intervention cohort. At each location, the main preventive and second intervention cohorts were used to stratify the randomization [9]. Patients with IDDM for 1 to 15 years, very mild to moderate no proliferative retinopathy [10, 11] and urine albumin excretion < 200 mg within 24 hours were required to meet the criteria for the secondary intervention cohort. At each location, the main preventive and second intervention cohorts were used to stratify the randomization [12].

Treatment

Conventional therapies included daily medium- and fast-acting insulin injections, daily self-monitoring of blood sugar or urine, and dietary counseling [7, 13]. Traditional medicine aimed to alleviate acute or recurring hypoglycemia as well as symptoms brought on by glycosuria or hyperglycemia, the absence of ketonuria, proper growth and development, and optimal weight maintenance. Intensive care was provided to women who got pregnant or were expected to get pregnant up until birth, following which they were given regular care. Intensive care involves the injection or external pumping of insulin at least three times daily. Blood sugar levels before meals should be between 70 and 120 mg/dL; after meals, they should be under 180 mg/dL; and monthly measurements of HbA1c (glycosylated hemoglobin) should be within the range of normal. Participants in the critical care group attended their study center once a month, and phone calls to discuss and modify regimens became more frequent. An adaptation of the Jaffe technique was used to measure the concentrations of serum and urine. A fluorescence immunoassay was used to assess the albumin levels in urine [14]. The timed clearance of 125I-iothalamate in a DCCT valve 10 was used to calculate the glomerular filtration rates, which were then corrected by body surface area.

Results

The chronological difference in glycosylated hemoglobin readings between the acute medical group and the conventional treatment group reflects adherence to recommended medication and how effectively critical care lowers blood sugar levels; Between the emergency surgery or standard care groups in both cohorts, a significant variation in mean glycosylated hemoglobin was maintained when baseline (P = 0.001) blood glucose levels were attained with each therapy. Retinopathy was assessed quarterly using seven-point capillary glucose levels in the blood. Intense therapy decreased the mean of the various threats of retinopathy by 76%, and the reduction in risk grew over time. Levels simultaneously of retinopathy is characterized by three or more phase transitions on fundus imaging lasting for 6 months. There weren’t enough patients in the main prevention group who needed photocoagulation, had clinically significant retinal edema, or had proliferating or severe no proliferation retinopathy [15]. Patients receiving intensive care had a greater prevalence rate of three or more grades of persistent retinopathy development throughout the first year of treatment in the additional intervention group than did patients receiving standard care, although the levels were simultaneously reduced at 36 months. An intensive course of therapy decreased the adjusted risk of photocoagulation by 56% (P = 0.002) and the adjusted risk of extreme or widespread no proliferative retinopathy by 47% (Figure 1). To ascertain if the risk decrease with intensive therapy was consistent across subgroups, the combined impact of three or even more stages of continuing retinopathy development was examined in patient subgroups. With intensive care, the risk of retinopathy was consistently reduced in both the main and secondary treatment arms across all categories. Consistent across clinics were the variations in retinal results between intensive and standard therapy.

Conclusion

The start and development of significant clinical retinopathy, particularly vision-threatening lesions, nephropathy, and neuropathy, are delayed and slowed by 35 to more than 70% in IDDM patients who get intensive therapy. It was possible to show how treatment affected age groups, the duration of diabetes, the severity of retinopathy, and the fundamental values of glycated hemoglobin in this study because of the substantial number of sick people researched, the participation of the preventive health group, and the lengthy follow-up period. Early relapses shouldn’t stop doctors from employing intensive treatment because they frequently disappear within 18 months, and those who were treated for them eventually had a 74% decreased risk of developing later illness. Compared to individuals who experienced an early recurrence and were given conventional therapy (P = 0.001), An earlier investigation of 36 IDDM patients with greater than our trial’s 40 patients’ initial urinary albumin excretion data showed a reduction in albuminuria development.

References

  1. National Diabetes Data Group (US) (1985) Diabetes in America: Diabetes data compiled 1984 (No. 85). US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Arthritis, Diabetes, and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. NIH Publication No. 85-1468.
  2. Deckert T, Poulsen JE, Larsen M (1978) Prognosis of diabetics with diabetes onset before the age of thirty-one: I. Survival, causes of death, and complications. Diabetologia 14: 363-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01228130
  3. DCCT Research Group (1986) The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT): design and methodologic considerations for the feasibility phase. Diabetes 35: 530-545. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.35.5.530
  4. DCCT Research Group (1987) Diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT): results of feasibility study. Diabetes Care 10: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.10.1.1
  5. DCCT Research Group (1990) Diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT): update. Diabetes Care 13: 427-433. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.13.4.427
  6. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL (1984) The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy: II. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is less than 30 years. Arch Ophthalmol 102: 520- 526. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030398010
  7. Lauritzen T, Frost-Larsen K, Larsen HW, Deckert T (1985) Two-year experience with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in relation to retinopathy and neuropathy. Diabetes 34: 74-79. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.34.3.s74
  8. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group (1991) Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy: ETDRS report number 12. Ophthalmology 98: 823-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(13)38014-2
  9. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group (2002) Effect of intensive therapy on the microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 287: 2563-2569. https://doi. org/10.1001/jama.287.19.2563
  10. Hovind P, Tarnow L, Rossing K, Rossing P, Eising S, et al. (2003) Decreasing incidence of severe diabetic microangiopathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 26: 1258-1264. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.4.1258
  11. King GL, Brownlee M (1996) The cellular and molecular mechanisms of diabetic complications. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 25: 255-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70324-8 
  12. Nyberg G, Blohme G, Norden G (1987) Impact of metabolic control in progression of clinical diabetic nephropathy. Diabetologia 30: 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00274576 
  13. Ballegooie EV, Hooymans JM, Timmerman Z, Reitsma WD, Sluiter WJ, et al. (1984) Rapid deterioration of diabetic retinopathy during treatment with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Diabetes Care 7: 236-242. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.7.3.236 
  14. Siperstein MD, Unger RH, Madison LL (1968) Studies of muscle capillary basement membranes in normal subjects, diabetic, and prediabetic patients. J Clin Invest 47: 1973-1999. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI105886
  15. Borch-Johnsen K, Andersen PK, Deckert T (1985) The effect of proteinuria on relative mortality in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 28: 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00281993 
scroll up