Human Virome View PDF

*Sana G AlAttas
Department Of Biological Sciences, Faculty Of Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author:
Sana G AlAttas
Department Of Biological Sciences, Faculty Of Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Published on: 2020-08-04

Abstract

Microorganisms found upon and within the human body play an important role in health and disease. The human virome refers to a whole genome of the human viruses living on and inside us . The genetic material of viruses includes both DNA and RNA because viruses lack a universal sequence platform, which makes it difficult to detect them or analyse their composition. By Entrance of next-generation sequencing (NGS), technology allowed the researcher to determine all viral sequences in a given sample, through an expanding field called viral metagenomics. Several factors affect on virome variation between individuals such as disease exposure to it, diet, immune status and birth mode. The gut virome consists of prokaryotic and eukaryotic viruses. However, prokaryotic viruses have an impact on human health by affecting the bacterial community function and structure. Bacteriophages are the most abundant enteric viruses. There is an interaction between virome and other members of the microbiome.

Keywords

Virome; Microbiome; Gut Virome; Viruses; Bacteriophage

Introduction

All microorganisms and their genes can form essential part of human body [1-3]. In recent years, the number of viruses, bacteria, fungi, protists and archaea staying upon and within the human body have been increasingly discovered. All these microorganisms play important roles in human health and disease, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), age, diabetes, diet and weight [4-10]. In 2003, the first article about 'virome' was published [11]. The article indicated that viruses are presented in the human microbiome. The first sequenced bacteriophages from faeces was published for an infected patient in the same year [12]. Intestines considered the most infected organ with viruses, and their number reach up to 10^9 per gram [13]. The term 'mammalian virome' refers to both eukaryotic virome that infects eukaryotic cells, bacterial virome or bacteriophages that infects bacteria and archaeal virome that infects archaea [14]. The genetic material of viruses includes both DNA and RNA because viruses lack a universal sequence platform, which makes it difficult to detect them or analyze their composition [15]. The huge development in sequencing technology and assembly of information in sequence databases made recent researchers to reveal that viruses and their genomes (virome) play important role in human health and disease [16-18]. Entrance of next-generation sequencing (NGS), technology allowed the researcher to determine all viral sequences in a given sample, through an expanding field called viral metagenomics [19]. Previous studies discovered that gut viruses had a beneficial role in normal microbial homeostasis despite pathogenic effects [19]. Eukaryotic viruses are capable to produce transient or stable infection and diseases in host cells. However, beneficial aspect of these viruses in health is rare [19]. Bacteriophages revolved around the concept that they are the most abundant entities on earth and also expand to the gut where they constitute the most abundant inhabitants [19]. The effect of gut bacteriophages on prokaryotic communities either by direct lysis of their host (lytic phages) or by integrating their genomes into the host (lysogenic phages or prophages) which result in changing the phenotype and fitness of the host cells [20]. When bacteriophages interact with their hosts, they compromise impacts on the biogeochemical cycling, composition of microbial communities and microbial abundance [21,22].

The Definition of Virome and its Components

The human microbiome refers to a whole genome of the human microbiota living on and inside us, encompassing fungi, bacteria, parasite, archaea and viruses [23]. Therefore, "microbiome" includes bacteriome, virome and mycobiome. However, researchers worked hard to study the human microbiome in different environments for example in animals, oceans or soil [23-25].

Recently, viruses have obtained their own “-omics” and “-ome” (meta) viromics and the virome. These terms include all viruses and their genomes that inhabit particular ecosystem and the study of them [26]. Human virome constitutes part of the microbiome which represent the most genetically diverse and ubiquitous fraction [27]. Because, virome plays a role on the biogeochemical cycling of nutrients, hence cause host diversification and breakdown trophic structures [28,29].

Viruses infecting prokaryotes or eukaryotes are present in the microbiota referred to virome [30]. Prokaryotic and eukaryotic viruses can cause latent or lytic life cycle which leads to virus evolution and survival (Figure 1) [31]. Consequently, when human eukaryotic viruses integrated into host chromosomes, then it can affect the host physiology, especially when particular site gets infected with chronic infection and virus-derived genetic elements can modify protein expression and host gene [14,32, and 33].

Few studies recorded on archaeal viruses of the family Lipothrixviridae [22]. On Earth, bacteriophages are considered the most abundant entities but also, inside the gut it is dominant than other viruses [34]. The majority of bacteriophage genome were sequenced from feces or gut samples belongs to ssDNA family Microviridae and dsDNA families Myoviridae, Siphoviridae, and Podoviridae [4,9, and 35]. The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology caused a revolution in the discovery of novel viruses in animals and human in different environments [36-38]. In spite of massive recent efforts have been made to study the critical role of viruses in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, Inflammatory Bowel Disease and diabetes patients. However, the role of virome in human diseases have been less described [8, 39-41].

There is an absence of validated methods that enable reproducible virome analysis and high throughput, hence constitute huge limitation in understanding the presence of human gut virome in disease and health [27]. One of these limitations, is that most of the genetic material in a sample is the non-viral origin, which causes precisely makes studying of the virome becomes more difficult than studying other microbiomes [42]. Viruses are considered the most morphologically and genetically diverse and lack universally preserved genomic regions [30].

Human Virome Diversity in Health and Disease

The human body in each compartment harbours distinctive viral population, here we discuss this separately. Several factors effect on virome variation between individuals such as disease exposure to it, diet, immune status and birth mode [34,43].

However, characterization of virome from different people around the world has revealed the role of the environment on its composition. Healthy people not showing any signs of disease and individuals that recently recover from acute infections harbor different viruses [44].

In Addition, the number of viruses varies according to the site that is occupied from,10^6 per ?cm?^2 on the skin, up to 10^8 per milliliter of saliva fluids , nasal, oral and pharynx , and 10^5 in the blood, 10^9 per gram in the intestinal and10^7 in the urine (Figure 2) [45,46]. Bacteriophages were the most abundant ones among them. The size of the human virome is poorly understood. As mentioned by Mokili JL, et al. (2012). Our cells exceed about 10-fold by our bacterium. Previously thought the number of viruses could be 10-fold higher still. And with the emerging of new RNA viruses that were unknown before the entrance of sequencing platforms, the number of eukaryotic virome may be larger than this thought [48].

Viruses don't have universally conserved genes because they are highly genetically diversity such as 16S rRNA in prokaryotes or 18S rRNA in eukaryotes. Consequently, cannot use metataxonomic approaches to characterize viruses. They relied upon classical approaches such as cultivation and microscopy to characterize gut viruses [49]. Nowadays researchers use bioinformatics tool to identify unknown viruses through massive search in database references (e.g. NCBI viral RefSeq) about homologous sequences [50]. This provides precise prediction about the desired viruses [45,46].

Virome was associated with different disease as shown in these studies which revealed a relationship between bacteriophages and eukaryotic virome with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) infection [8,51, and 52]. Moreover, gut phageome is associated with colorectal cancer and type I diabetes [53,54]. While diarrhoea in AIDS and infants had been linked to eukaryotic virome [55].

One recent study was conducted in 2018, found that bacteriophages diversity in patients gut with colorectal cancer (CRC) was significantly increased compared with healthy people [56]. Data from this study can be used to identify all patients with predicted outcomes or CRC [56].

Another study was conducted with HIV patients showed that the most frequently sequences assigned to bacteriophages of Microviridae family or Caudovirales order along with several eukaryotic virus families and other viral families were defined as ‘‘unclassified’’ in the NCBI Taxonomy Database. Also, it was found that there were no significant differences between HIV-negative and HIV-positive for Papillomaviridae, Adenoviridae, Circoviridae and Anelloviridae [57].

Gastrointestinal Tract

The concept of viral infection has changed since mucosal viruses exist in healthy people. Viruses are abundant in the gastrointestinal tract even without showing any symptoms, in the healthy gut mucosa described by frequent infections which become part of virome and in turn promote damaging and/or beneficial impact on the host [1].

The intestinal human virome is more than 10^9 viral particles per gram of faeces [1,35]. The gut virome consist of prokaryotic and eukaryotic viruses. Moreover, prokaryotic viruses have an impact on human health by affecting the bacterial community function andstructure [9,35, and 52]. While bacteriophages are the most abundant enteric viruses, which can harbour up to 10^14 bacterial cells according to sequencing from the faecal sample [58]. Until now there are many bacteriophages have not been classified yet, currently the most prevalent prokaryotic viruses belong to the order Caudovirales (Myoviridae, Podoviridae and Siphoviridae) in which they were characterized as tailed and double-stranded DNA viruses together with (Microviridae) which have tailless cubic, or filamentous single-stranded DNA viruses [59].

In fact the number of eukaryotic viruses is less than bacteriophages inside the gut [4,9, and 60]. Moreover, a faecal sample from healthy children has discovered several families of viruses which includes Astroviridae, Picobirnaviridae, Anelloviridae, Adenoviridae and species such as sapoviruses, bocaviruses, rotaviruses and rotaviruses [43].

Although they show few numbers, these viruses play a critical role in health and immune compromised subjects, which give rise to colitis, acute gastroenteritis or acute enteritis [43,61, and 62]. For example, in the fecal sample of individuals suffered from diarrhea of unknown aetiology, Picobirna viruses have been found [63-65]. In addition to that, RNA viruses were found (plant viruses) in the gut which has been introduced in the diet [4,9,35,52,59, and 66].

In the gastrointestinal tract, there is a dynamic community structure described by prey-predator interactions which provide horizontal gene transfer [66]. A recent study revealed that the development of symbiotic relationships between virome and the host at a young age with variation occurs at the first two years, and that is according to dietary and environmental changes. In contrast, people on the same diet system have a similar composition of gut virome [4,35]. The imbalances between pathobionts and symbiotic bacteria (dysbiosis) may contribute to the transmission from healthy state to disease, which caused by intestinal bacteriophage [67]. However, there are continuous changes in the function, structure and diversity of the gut microbial communities (dysbiosis) which are mainly contributed to the emergence and maintenance of several diseases [68-70]. Such as cancer, colon cancer, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn’s Disease (CD) and obesity [71-75].

The complex interplay between environmental factors, cognate microbiota and the host can help in the gut dysbiosis development [50,76]. Recent studies revealed that the gut virome have a critical role in disease progression and homeostatic regulation over multiple interaction paths with human immune system component or with bacteriome [76].

The merge between re-analysis of the virome data to establish consistent processing and extensive virus identification, gut metagenomes from 572 individuals were collected and an extensive metadata curation through literature mining and, as needed, direct communication with the original researchers contributed in the development of Gut Virome Database (GVD). This database includes 13,204 viral communities predominant by phages [77].

The Interaction between Virome and other Member of Microbiome

In adults, gut virome and bacterial microbiome are mainly stable and are resilient to change. While in the infant's gut virome and bacterial microbiome are highly dynamic in nature during early development [4,9, and 78]. The bacterial microbiome structure can change by bacteriophages through prey-predator relationships [8,79].

However, there are significant findings from previous studies that there is an interaction between bacteria and viruses which can make huge effect on disease and health status of the host [31,80]. The intestinal antiviral immunity relies on Gram-negative bacterial signaling [81]. In contrast, the mechanism of enteric virus infection is a defense line against pathogenic bacteria and intestinal damage [82]. Moreover, the replication of enteric viruses such as rotavirus, poliovirus, reovirus, and mouse mammary tumour virus and mouse norovirus can also be enhanced by the bacterial microbiome [82-87].

As mentioned previously, asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals can carry eukaryotic viruses. This results from either a direct interaction with the host or with the interplay with other members of the micro biota [1,19, and 88-91]. Most of these interactions are happening inside the gut. For example, when enteric viruses enter the human body they find a large number of inhabitant microorganisms inside the intestinal lumen, and the majority of them are commensal bacteria, but also another kind of microorganism such as viruses, archaea, protozoa and fungi, with which they enable to interact [19].

The interaction between them can also modulate viral infection [80,92, and 93]. The direct physical interaction between microbiome can enhance enteric viruses. Such as the interaction between commensal bacteria reovirus and poliovirus that increases the viral infectivity [84]. In the case of poliovirus, it binds to the bacterial surface polysaccharides, which promotes its binding and its stability to cells through its attachment to the cellular receptor [93]. Furthermore, recent findings have shown that bacteria can facilitate poliovirus infection and enhance virus genetic recombination [94].

Additionally, the enteric bacteria were shown to enhance the replication of rotavirus and diarrhoea in vivo [85]. Also, the microbiota has the ability to weaken the antiviral host immune response which stimulates a tolerogenic environment, and this results in an ease of the establishment of a chronic infection [83,92]. This weakening can be due to either modifying the virus-induced interferon (IFN) signaling [87,92], or by the antiviral antibody response suppression [85,92] All these examples have revealed the ability of commensal microbiota in enhancing many enteric viruses infection.

Besides, many positive effects, microbiota can also affect negatively on viral infection. The binding of rotavirus to a cell requires the interaction with the glycan layer on the cell surface. When inserting human intestinal cells into a culture made of bacterial soluble factors such as L. casei and B. the taiotao micron that increases cell-surface, it was found that it prevents the rotavirus infection [95]. In the neonatal mouse model, it was found that the duration of rotavirus diarrhoea was being lowered by probiotic bacteria L. reuteri [96].

Conclusion

Even though virome is a hot topic of research, luckily there are only few studies about it. Moreover, the limitations in virome studies are few in terms of patients and literature numbers, the absence of validated methods, the viral diversity and the lack of universally preserved genomic regions. The role of virome in diseases has been less described despite the efforts in the study of the role of viruses in many diseases. There are several factors that has an effect on the virome variation. Researchers must study these factors in more details. The human body in each compartment harbor different viruses but until now the size of the virome body is still poorly understood. Most of the studied viruses belong to DNA viruses. RNA viruses need more study. Bacteriophages are the most abundant in the world and in the human body as well. There are interactions between viruses and microbiome. These interactions can result in either a positive or negative effect on the host. However, the microbiota members can modulate viral infectivity. Also, viruses can modulate bacterial infection in the gut. Consequently, it can help in the anti-microbial resistance. Briefly, virome has a significant role in health status and disease. It is important to study their role.

References

  1. Duerkop BA, Hooper LV (2013) Resident viruses and their interactions with the immune system. Nat Immunol 14: 654-659.
  2. Moissl-Eichinger C, Pausan M, Taffner J, Berg G, Bang C, et al. (2018) Archaea are interactive components of complex microbiomes. Trends Microbiol 26: 70-85.
  3. Vitetta L, Vitetta G, Hall S (2018) Immunological tolerance and function: associations between intestinal bacteria, probiotics, prebiotics, and phages. Front Immunol 9: 2240.
  4. Minot S, Sinha R, Chen J, Li H, Keilbaugh SA, et al. (2011) The human gut virome: inter-individual variation and dynamic response to diet. Genome Res 21: 1616-1625.
  5. Claesson MJ, Jeffery IB, Conde S, Power SE, O’connor EM, et al. (2012) Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature 488: 178-184.
  6. Cryan JF, Dinan TG (2012) Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 13: 701-712.
  7. Frank DN, Robertson CE, Hamm CM, Kpadeh Z, Zhang T, et al. (2011) Disease phenotype and genotype are associated with shifts in intestinal-associated microbiota in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflammat Bowel Dis 17: 179-184.
  8. Norman JM, Handley SA, Baldridge MT, Droit L, Liu CY, et al. (2015) Disease-specific alterations in the enteric virome in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell 160: 447-460.
  9. Reyes A, Haynes M, Hanson N, Angly FE, Heath AC, et al. (2010) Viruses in the faecal microbiota of monozygotic twins and their mothers. Nature 466: 334-338.
  10. Tremaroli V, Bäckhed F (2012) Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature 489: 242-249.
  11. Anderson NG, Gerin JL, Anderson NL (2003) Global screening for human viral pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 9: 768.
  12. Breitbart M, Hewson I, Felts B, Mahaffy JM, Nulton J, et al. (2003) Metagenomic analyses of an uncultured viral community from human feces. J Bacteriol 185: 6220-6223.
  13. Kim MS, Park EJ, Roh SW, Bae JW (2011) Diversity and abundance of single-stranded DNA viruses in human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 8062-8070.
  14. Virgin HW, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R (2009) Redefining chronic viral infection. Cell 138: 30-50.
  15. Simmonds P, Adams MJ, Benk? M, Breitbart M, Brister JR, et al. (2017) Consensus statement: virus taxonomy in the age of metagenomics. Nat Rev Microbiol 15: 161-168.
  16. Ungaro F, Massimino L, Furfaro F, Rimoldi V, Peyrin-Biroulet L, et al. (2019) Metagenomic analysis of intestinal mucosa revealed a specific eukaryotic gut virome signature in early-diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease. Gut Microbes 10: 149-158.
  17. Shkoporov AN, Hill C (2019) Bacteriophages of the human gut: the “known unknown” of the microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 25: 195-209.
  18. Kramná L, Cinek O (2018) Virome sequencing of stool samples. Human Virome: 59-83.
  19. Zárate S, Taboada B, Yocupicio-Monroy M, Arias CF (2017) Human virome. Arch Med Res 48: 701-716.
  20. Obeng N, Pratama AA, van Elsas JD (2016) The significance of mutualistic phages for bacterial ecology and evolution. Tren Microbiol 24: 440-449.
  21. Morella NM, Gomez AL, Wang G, Leung MS, Koskella B (2018) The impact of bacteriophages on phyllosphere bacterial abundance and composition. Mol Ecol 27: 2025-2038.
  22. Lim ES, Zhou Y, Zhao G, Bauer IK, Droit L, et al. (2015) Early life dynamics of the human gut virome and bacterial microbiome in infants. Nat Med 21: 1228-1234.
  23. Marchesi JR (2010) Prokaryotic and eukaryotic diversity of the human gut. Adv appl Microbiol: 43-62.
  24. Sunagawa S, Coelho LP, Chaffron S, Kultima JR, Labadie K, et al. (2015) Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 348: 1261359.
  25. Navarrete AA, Tsai SM, Mendes LW, Faust K, de Hollander M, et al. (2015) Soil microbiome responses to the short?term effects of Amazonian deforestation. Mol Ecol 24: 2433-2448.
  26. Garmaeva S, Sinha T, Kurilshikov A, Fu J, Wijmenga C, et al. (2019) Studying the gut virome in the metagenomic era: challenges and perspectives. BMC Biol 17: 84.
  27. Conceição-Neto N, Zeller M, Lefrère H, De Bruyn P, Beller L, et al. (2015) Modular approach to customise sample preparation procedures for viral metagenomics: a reproducible protocol for virome analysis. Sci Rep 5: 1-14.
  28. Peduzzi P, Gruber M, Gruber M, Schagerl M (2014) The virus’s tooth: cyanophages affect an African flamingo population in a bottom-up cascade. ISME J 8: 1346-1351.
  29. Clokie MR, Millard AD, Letarov AV, Heaphy S (2011) Phages in nature. Bacteriophage 1: 31-45.
  30. Koonin EV, Dolja VV, Krupovic M (2015) Origins and evolution of viruses of eukaryotes: the ultimate modularity. Virology 479: 2-25.
  31. Virgin HW (2014) The virome in mammalian physiology and disease. Cell 157: 142-150.
  32. Foxman EF, Iwasaki A (2011) Genome-virome interactions: examining the role of common viral infections in complex disease. Nat Rev Microbiol 9: 254-264.
  33. Stelekati E, Wherry EJ (2012) Chronic bystander infections and immunity to unrelated antigens. Cell Host Microbe 12: 458-469.
  34. Beller L, Matthijnssens J (2019) What is (not) known about the dynamics of the human gut virome in health and disease. Curr Opin Virol 37: 52-57.
  35. Minot S, Bryson A, Chehoud C, Wu GD, Lewis JD, et al. (2013) Rapid evolution of the human gut virome. Proce Nat Aca Sci 110: 12450-12455.
  36. Phan TG, Kapusinszky B, Wang C, Rose RK, Lipton HL, et al. (2011) The fecal viral flora of wild rodents. PLoS Pathog 7:
  37. Bodewes R, Ruiz-Gonzalez A, Schapendonk CM, van den Brand JM, Osterhaus AD, et al. (2014) Viral metagenomic analysis of feces of wild small carnivores. Virol J 11: 89.
  38. Conceição-Neto N, Zeller M, Heylen E, Lefrère H, Mesquita JR, et al. (2015) Fecal virome analysis of three carnivores reveals a novel nodavirus and multiple gemycircularviruses. Virol J 12: 79.
  39. Li L, Deng X, Linsuwanon P, Bangsberg D, Bwana MB, et al. (2013) AIDS alters the commensal plasma virome. J Virol 87: 10912-10915.
  40. Kramná L, Kolá?ová K, Oikarinen S, Pursiheimo JP, Ilonen J, et al. (2015) Gut virome sequencing in children with early islet autoimmunity. Diab Care 38: 930-933.
  41. Young JC, Chehoud C, Bittinger K, Bailey A, Diamond JM, et al. (2015) Viral metagenomics reveal blooms of anelloviruses in the respiratory tract of lung transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 15: 200-209.
  42. Reyes A, Semenkovich NP, Whiteson K, Rohwer F, Gordon JI (2012) Going viral: next-generation sequencing applied to phage populations in the human gut. Nat Rev Microbiol 10: 607-617.
  43. Kapusinszky B, Minor P, Delwart E (2012) Nearly constant shedding of diverse enteric viruses by two healthy infants. J Clin Microbiol 50: 3427-3434.
  44. Atmar RL, Opekun AR, Gilger MA, Estes MK, Crawford SE, et al. (2008) Norwalk virus shedding after experimental human infection. Emerg Infect Dis 14: 1553.
  45. Pride DT, Salzman J, Haynes M, Rohwer F, Davis-Long C, et al. (2012) Evidence of a robust resident bacteriophage population revealed through analysis of the human salivary virome. ISME J 6: 915-926.
  46. Santiago-Rodriguez TM, Ly M, Bonilla N, Pride DT (2015) The human urine virome in association with urinary tract infections. Front Microbiol 6: 14.
  47. Mokili JL, Rohwer F, Dutilh BE (2012) Metagenomics and future perspectives in virus discovery. Curr Opin Virol 2: 63-77.
  48. Acevedo A, Andino R (2014) Library preparation for highly accurate population sequencing of RNA viruses. Nat Prot 9: 1760-1769.
  49. Carding SR, Davis N, Hoyles L (2017) The human intestinal virome in health and disease. Alimen Pharmacol Therapeu 46: 800-815.
  50. Mirzaei MK, Maurice CF (2017) Ménage à trois in the human gut: interactions between host, bacteria and phages. Nat Rev Microbiol 15: 397-408.
  51. Lopes S, Andrade P, Conde S, Liberal R, Dias CC, et al. (2017) Looking into enteric virome in patients with IBD: defining guilty or innocence? Inflammatory Bowel Dis 23: 1278-1284.
  52. Cadwell K, Patel KK, Maloney NS, Liu TC, Ng AC, et al. (2010) Virus-plus-susceptibility gene interaction determines Crohn's disease gene Atg16L1 phenotypes in intestine. Cell 141: 1135-1145.
  53. Zhao G, Vatanen T, Droit L, Park A, Kostic AD, et al. (2017) Intestinal virome changes precede autoimmunity in type I diabetes-susceptible children. Proceed Nat Acade Sci 114: E6166-E6175.
  54. Hannigan GD, Duhaime MB, Ruffin MT, Koumpouras CC, Schloss PD (2018) Diagnostic potential and interactive dynamics of the colorectal cancer virome. MBio 9: e02248-e02318.
  55. Phan TG, Da Costa AC, del Valle Mendoza J, Bucardo-Rivera F, Nordgren J, et al. (2016) The fecal virome of South and Central American children with diarrhea includes small circular DNA viral genomes of unknown origin. Arch Virol 161: 959-966.
  56. Nakatsu G, Zhou H, Wu WK, Wong SH, Coker OO, et al. (2018) Alterations in enteric virome are associated with colorectal cancer and survival outcomes. Gastroenterol 155: 529-541.
  57. Monaco CL, Gootenberg DB, Zhao G, Handley SA, Ghebremichael MS, et al. (2016) Altered virome and bacterial microbiome in human immunodeficiency virus-associated acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Cell Host Microbe 19: 311-322.
  58. Breitbart M, Haynes M, Kelley S, Angly F, Edwards RA, et al. (2008) Viral diversity and dynamics in an infant gut. Res Microbiol 159: 367-373.
  59. Ackermann HW (2009) Phage classification and characterization. Bacteriophag 501: 127-140.
  60. Zhang T, Breitbart M, Lee WH, Run JQ, Wei CL, et al. (2005) RNA viral community in human feces: prevalence of plant pathogenic viruses. PLoS Biol 4: e3.
  61. Clark B, McKendrick M (2004) A review of viral gastroenteritis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 17: 461-469.
  62. Focà A, Liberto MC, Quirino A, Marascio N, Zicca E, et al. (2015) Gut inflammation and immunity: what is the role of the human gut virome? Mediat Inflammat 2015.
  63. Bányai K, Jakab F, Reuter G, Bene J, Uj M, et al. (2003) Sequence heterogeneity among human picobirnaviruses detected in a gastroenteritis outbreak. Arch Virol 148: 2281-2291.
  64. Finkbeiner SR, Allred AF, Tarr PI, Klein EJ, Kirkwood CD, et al. (2008) Metagenomic analysis of human diarrhea: viral detection and discovery. PLoS Pathog 4:
  65. van Leeuwen M, Williams MM, Koraka P, Simon JH, Smits SL, et al. (2010) Human picobirnaviruses identified by molecular screening of diarrhea samples. J Clin Microbiol 48: 1787-1794.
  66. Brüssow H, Canchaya C, Hardt WD (2004) Phages and the evolution of bacterial pathogens: from genomic rearrangements to lysogenic conversion. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68: 560-602.
  67. De Paepe M, Leclerc M, Tinsley CR, Petit MA (2014) Bacteriophages: an underestimated role in human and animal health? Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4: 39.
  68. Frank DN, Amand AL, Feldman RA, Boedeker EC, Harpaz N, et al. (2007) Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proceed Nat Acad Sci 104: 13780-13785.
  69. Huttenhower C, Gevers D, Knight R, Abubucker S, Badger JH, et al. (2012) Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486: 207-214.
  70. Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, et al. (2012) A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490: 55-60.
  71. Yoshimoto S, Loo TM, Atarashi K, Kanda H, Sato S, et al. (2013) Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome. Nature 499: 97-101.
  72. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144: 646-674.
  73. Sun L, Nava GM, Stappenbeck TS (2011) Host genetic susceptibility, dysbiosis and viral triggers in IBD. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 27: 321.
  74. Cario E (2013) Microbiota and innate immunity in intestinal inflammation and neoplasia. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 29: 85-91.
  75. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, et al. (2006) An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444: 1027.
  76. Shreiner AB, Kao JY, Young VB (2015) The gut microbiome in health and in disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 31: 69-75.
  77. Gregory AC, Zablocki O, Howell A, Bolduc B, Sullivan MB, et al. (2019) The human gut virome database. BioRxiv 655910.
  78. Lozupone CA, Stombaugh JI, Gordon JI, Jansson JK, Knight R (2012) Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature 489: 220-230.
  79. Rodriguez-Valera F, Martin-Cuadrado AB, Rodriguez-Brito B, Pasic L, Thingstad TF, et al. (2009) Explaining microbial population genomics through phage predation. Nat Preced 1: 1.
  80. Pfeiffer JK, Virgin HW (2016) Transkingdom control of viral infection and immunity in the mammalian intestine. Science 351: aad5872.
  81. Sansone CL, Cohen J, Yasunaga A, Xu J, Osborn G, et al. (205) Microbiota-dependent priming of antiviral intestinal immunity in Drosophila. Cell Host Microbe 18: 571-581.
  82. Kernbauer E, Ding Y, Cadwell K (2014) An enteric virus can replace the beneficial function of commensal bacteria. Nature 516: 94-98.
  83. Kane M, Case LK, Kopaskie K, Kozlova A, MacDearmid C, et al. (2011) Successful transmission of a retrovirus depends on the commensal microbiota. Science 334: 245-249.
  84. Kuss SK, Best GT, Etheredge CA, Pruijssers AJ, Frierson JM, et al. (2011) Intestinal microbiota promote enteric virus replication and systemic pathogenesis. Science 334: 249-252.
  85. Uchiyama R, Chassaing B, Zhang B, Gewirtz AT (2014) Antibiotic treatment suppresses rotavirus infection and enhances specific humoral immunity. J Infect Dis 210: 171-182.
  86. Jones MK, Watanabe M, Zhu S, Graves CL, Keyes LR, et al. (2014) Enteric bacteria promote human and mouse norovirus infection of B cells. Science 346: 755-759.
  87. Baldridge MT, Nice TJ, McCune BT, Yokoyama CC, Kambal A, et al. (2015) Commensal microbes and interferon-λ determine persistence of enteric murine norovirus infection. Science 347: 266-269.
  88. Popgeorgiev N, Temmam S, Raoult D, Desnues C (2013) Describing the silent human virome with an emphasis on giant viruses. Intervirol 56: 395-412.
  89. Honda K, Littman DR (2012) The microbiome in infectious disease and inflammation. Ann Rev Immunol : 759-795.
  90. Lecuit M, Eloit M (2013) The human virome: new tools and concepts. Trends Microbiol 21: 510-515.
  91. Rascovan N, Duraisamy R, Desnues C (2016) Metagenomics and the human virome in asymptomatic individuals. Ann Rev Microbiol 70: 125-141.
  92. Karst SM (2016) The influence of commensal bacteria on infection with enteric viruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 14: 197-204.
  93. Robinson CM, Pfeiffer JK (2014) Viruses and the microbiota. Ann Rev Virol 1: 55-69.
  94. Erickson AK, Jesudhasan PR, Mayer MJ, Narbad A, Winter SE, et al. (2017) Bacteria facilitate viral co-infection of mammalian cells and promote genetic recombination. bioRxiv 154021.
  95. Varyukhina S, Freitas M, Bardin S, Robillard E, Tavan E, et al. (2012) Glycan-modifying bacteria-derived soluble factors from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Lactobacillus casei inhibit rotavirus infection in human intestinal cells. Microbes Infect 14: 273-278.
  96. Preidis GA, Saulnier DM, Blutt SE, Mistretta TA, Riehle KP, et al. (2012) Host response to probiotics determined by nutritional status of rotavirus-infected neonatal mice. J Pedia Gastroenterol Nutrit 55: 299-307.
scroll up