Risk Parameters of Consuming Smokeless Tobacco “Madgha”: A Study in Aswan, Upper Egypt View PDF

*Shaimaa S Abdlrheem
Department Of Public Health And Community Medicine, Faculty Of Medicine, Aswan University, Egypt

*Corresponding Author:
Shaimaa S Abdlrheem
Department Of Public Health And Community Medicine, Faculty Of Medicine, Aswan University, Egypt
Email:dr_shimaasayed@yahoo.com

Published on: 2020-03-02

Abstract

Background: Smokeless tobacco (ST) use is a public practice in different places of the world. In Upper Egypt, Madgha is one of the chewable used tobacco consumed by individuals of different age groups. Being available and inexpensive has led to high consumption.
Objective: The current study aimed to examine the effect of Madgha on some hematological and biochemical parameters for Madgha users in Aswan.
Methods: We collected blood samples from 180 apparently healthy subjects, Madgha users (n=90) and their controls (n=90). Standard methods were used to examine the hematological and biochemical parameters.
Results: In a comparison of Madgha users with their controls, the results of hematological parameters showed a significant elevation in total white blood cell count, neutrophil and serum ESR, and a significant reduction in the percentage of lymphocytes and monocytes. Higher biochemical parameters like CRP, lipid contents, fasting blood glucose, and liver enzymes were observed in the blood samples of Madgha users. And a positive correlation between each of the white blood cell counts, platelet count, and CRP with the long duration of Madgha intake was reported in the study.
Conclusion: The study concluded that the consumption of Madgha might have harmed both hematological and biochemical parameters. Awareness is immensely needed to stop Madgha’s usage and safeguard people’s health in Aswan.

Keywords

Smokeless Tobacco; ST users; Madgha; Hematological and Biochemical parameters

Introduction

Over the years, the consumption of tobacco products remains animportant public health issue.  Nicotine is present in different tobacco forms, including smoking and smokeless tobacco (ST) [1]. Smokeless tobacco (ST) use is a public practice in different places of the world. Smokeless tobacco (ST) is used without combustion and this obliterates the hazard of direct exposure to theburnedtoxic compounds to the users and the individuals around them [2]. There have been significant differences in the structure and manufacturing of ST products, the two main formsof which ST comes in are snuff and chewing tobacco. Smokelesstobacco products are called Shammain Saudi Arabia, Saot in Sudan, Tombak in Yamen, and Madgha in Egypt [3].

In Upper Egypt, Madgha is one of thechewable used tobacco consumed by individuals of different age groups, formed ofpowdered dried tobacco leaves mixed with Atron²a stony salty material coming from Sudanese mountains². Madghais sold in packs where each onecomposed of 12 pieces,each pieceis 3 grams, where it is used by placing a piece between lower labile mucosa and gum for 10 min, the user spits out or swallows it [4]. Being available and inexpensive has led to high consumption. Madgha is highly prevalent among individuals with a lowsocioeconomic standard. They believe that the health hazardsrelated to ST use are less than those related to smoked tobacco also they think ST has a curative effect on relieving pain and work-related stress [5].

Smokeless tobacco is easily anaddictive substance as it has a high amount of nicotineas well as numerous cancer-causing substances compared to smoking tobacco [6]. Using any form of ST is anextraordinary health incident for the body organs whichmainlylinked with systemic illnesses depending on the way of consuming Madgha and its nature of the toxic products.2  Earlier studies showed that ST has a durable association with a variety of oral, cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal diseases. ST seems to beinfluential in cellular and metabolic changes inside human bodies, particularly with long use duration [7,8]. By 2020, it is predicted that around 10 million deaths may arise if the continuous use pattern of ST is kept on [9]. The effect of ST use on some hematologic and biochemical parameters has been discussed by the earlier studies [10-12]. Still, evidence shows that persons are not well informed about the risks ofsmokeless tobacco. The monitoring of these parameters for ST users is entirely required to guide them about ST health hazards.  This study aims to minimize the trend of Madgha consuming in Upper Egypt.

The study aims to examine the effect ofMadgha use on some hematological and biochemical parameters in Madgha users and to educate them about the health hazards of smokeless tobacco.

Methods

Study design and duration

A case-control study design was conducted over two months from August to September 2017.

Study subject and sampling

The study subjects included healthy individuals aged 18-50 years oldwho came to Aswan university hospital as visitors to their relatives who had been admitted to inpatient departments.

The sample size was calculated using G power program version 3.1.9.2. in order to detect a significance difference in mean value of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) between two independent groups under the study, and based on the followinginput parameters being one tailed, with the effect size of0.49 as detected in Biswas et al. study8 and with analpha error of 0,05, power of 95%,  and the allocation ratio between controls to cases was 1:1, thereforeninety subjects were included in each  study group with total of 180 subjects. The required sample was collected by convenience sampling. The refusal rate was found to be 6.7%, (12 subjects refused to contribute as they did not want to go through any laboratory investigation), those subjects were not included in the study. Therecruited studied persons were divided into two groups: 

  1. i) Madgha-users, people who use only ST (n=90), not any other form of tobacco, regularly >20 times per week for at least 3 consecutive years.
  2. ii) Non-users (n=90), persons who do not use any type of tobacco. The controls were age-and sex-matched for Madgha users. People who were taking any regular medication, and those with a recent history of infection (within the last month) and people of any vascular, systemic and metabolic diseases, or immunocompromised conditions, alcoholics, and women in pregnancy or inhormonal replacement therapy were excluded from this study.

Data collection

Our data was collected through direct interviews, clinical examinationand laboratory analyses. The direct interview was done to get complete demographicdata, clinical history and information on Madgha consumption. After the study participants completed their data with the interviewers, clinical and anthropometric examinations were done for allsubjects and blood pressure were measured twice in a sitting position, with 5 min apart.

In all the subjects arterial blood pressure, blood pressure and anthropometric data (height, weight and waist circumference) were measured. Waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest. BMI was calculated as body weight (kg) divided by body height (m) squared. Blood pressure of each subject was measured with a mercury Sphygmomanometer and a standard stethoscope. Blood samples were drawn after an overnight fast. Each test procedure was carried out between 7-10 a.m. The subjects underwent the following tests: Blood pressure examination to rule out hypertension, estimation of the serum lipid profile, evaluation of the fasting and post prandial blood glucose levels to rule out diabetes, red blood cell count, total leukocyte count, differential leukocyte count, platelet count, packed cell volume, hemoglobin, serum urea and creatinine levels. Complete blood cell count was analyzed by CELL-DYN 3700 fully automatic haematological analyzer.

Regarding laboratory analyses,somehematological and biochemical parameterswere tested for ST-usersand non-users, and then compared. To examine the studied parameters, venous blood samples (7 ml) were drawn from each subject between 7-10 a.m. under strict aseptic conditions and after 12 hoursof overnight fasting. Each sample was divided into 3 parts;the first part (2 ml) was collected into tubes containing anticoagulant (K3 EDTA)used for CBC and differential count, the second part (2ml) was collected into tubescontaining (0.5 ml) 3.8% Sodium citrate anticoagulant used for ESR estimation,  and the third part (3 ml) was allowed to clot in Wassermann tubes. Sera were obtained by centrifugation and divided into aliquots and used for liver enzymes, CRP, fasting blood glucose level, total lipid profile, serum creatinine, and ureaestimation. Hematological parameters such as hemoglobin, red blood cells, and leukocyte total and differential count were done on (Cell Dyne 3700, Abbott diag. USA) automated blood cellcounteract. ESR estimation by the Westergrenmethod.13The biochemical parameters including fasting blood glucose level, total lipid profile, serum creatinine, urea, serum AST, ALT, ALP levels were measured on an automated chemistry analyzer(APX pentra 400, Horiba diag.France). CRP estimation by rapid latex agglutination kit (AVITEX- CRP) (Omega Diag. Ltd 2015).In the end, every user was instructed by one of the authors for 10 minutes about health hazards of smokeless tobacco on body systems and possible links to oral diseases other cancers and cardiovascular disease.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS V. 23.0 and the mean ± standard deviation (SD) were calculated for the selected hematologic and biochemical parameters. The student t-test was used to test the significance of thevariance of the study parameters between Madgha users and controls. Qi squaretest and Pearson correlation were also used. In all cases, a P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. 

Ethical consideration

The approval of the study was carried by the Ethical Review Committee of Aswan Faculty of Medicine before starting to work on the study. The study was in accord with the Second Declaration of Helsinki. We informed the study subjects with the details of the study procedures, and all subjects signed a written informed consent before their participation in the study.In case subjects were not able to read, an impartial witnesshad to be there at that time to explain accurately the content of the informed consent and sign it on the behalf of the subject in case of his\her approval.

Results

The baseline data of Madgha users and their controls are presented in table (1), there were statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding residence, education and working for cash in last 12 months,more than half percent of Madgha consumers (55.5%) were from rural areas. Illiterate/Read and write subjects represented approximately forty percent of Madgha consumers (37.8%) and about one-third of them (33.3%) were not working for cash in the last 12 months. 

In comparison to the control group, it was found that Madgha consumers experienced  a significant elevation in blood pressure either systolic or diastolic (P< 0.05), while the rest of the explanatoryvariables in this table were not significant (P> 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1:  Baseline characteristic of the study population.

Characteristics

Madgha -users

(n= 90)

Non -users

(n= 90)

P value

No.

%

No.

%

Age in years:Mean ± SD (Range)

31.73 ± 7.44 (18 - 45)

31.47 ± 7.34 (19- 47)

0.194

Gender

 

Male

60

66.7

62

68.9

0.122

Female

30

33.3

28

31.1

Residence

 

Urban

40

44.4

60

66.7

0.011

Rural

50

55.5

30

33.3

Education

 

 

 

0.001

Illiterate / Read and write

34

37.8

14

15.6

Basic

26

28.9

22

24.4

Secondary or above

30

33.3

54

60.0

Working for cash in the last 12 months:

 

Yes

60

66.7

72

80.0

0.041

No

30

33.3

18

20.0

Daily vegetable intake:

 

Yes

12

13.3

18

20.0

0.094

No

78

86.7

72

80.0

Body mass index BMI:

27.6±2

29.7±1.9

0.071

Waist circumference (cm)••

 

Male

0.89 ± 0.31

0.96 ± 0.05

0.064

Female

0.80 ± 0.12

0.82 ± 0.15

Pulse (beats/ min)

65±23

67±24

0.521

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg): •••

132±9

121±8

0.021

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): •••

82±9

74±6

0.011

Madgha use duration (year):

 

-

-

Mean ± SD (years)                                                                                                           10.3±5.4

Data presented are mean ± SD; NS: Non-Significant P < 0.05;chi square test; Student's t-test             

  • BMI was calculated as body weight (kg) divided by body height (m) squared.
  • • Waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest.
  • •• Blood pressure was measured with a mercury Sphygmomanometer and a standard stethoscope. Systolic blood pressure was recorded at the level when phase 1 Korotkoff sounds were first heard and diastolic blood pressure was recorded at the beginning of phase 5 with the disappearance of sounds.

From the data presented in table,the hematological profile of Madgha users differed from the controls group in the following: They had significantly higher total white cell count and ESR (Table 2). The results of the differential count showed that they had a significantly higher percentage of neutrophil while they had a significantly lower percentage of lymphocyte, monocyte in their blood. Moreover, the red cell count, hemoglobin level, hematocrit, eosinophils and basophils percentages in their blood did not significantly differ from the control group.

Table 2:  Effect of Madgha on hematological and biochemical parameters.

Parameters

 

Madgha -users

(n= 90)

Non -users

(n= 90)

P-value

Hematological parameters:

 

Red cell Count(×1012/L)

4.9 ± 0.3

4.5 ± 0.2

0.225 (NS)

Hemoglobin gm/dL

14.1 ± 2.0

13.1 ± 1.1

 0.095 (NS)

Hematocrit (%)

44.6 ± 2.4

40.3 ± 3.0

0.054 (NS)

White cell count(×109/L)

6.3 ± 1.2

5.4 ± 0.3

0.001

Neutrophils (%)

68.5 ± 5.8

56.4 ± 5.3

< 0.001

Lymphocytes (%)

30.7 ± 5.4

38 ± 4.7

< 0.001

Monocytes (%)

1.8 ±1.0

2.9 ± 1.3

< 0.001

Eosinophils (%)

1.9 ± 1.1

1.7 ± 0.8

0.991 (NS)

Basophils (%)

0.6 + 0.6

0.6 + 1.0

0.231 (NS)

Platelet count (×109/L)

295 ± 54

279 ± 42

0.092 (NS)

ESR (mm/ hr) first hour

13.5±3.6

11.1±2.7

0.022 (NS)

PCV (%)

40.44 ± 5.66

41.46 ± 4.88

0.124 (NS)

MCV (fl)

81.97 ± 7.30

82.63 ± 4.70

0.333 (NS)

MCH (pg)

28.31 ± 2.64

27.83 ± 4.30

0.266 (NS)

MCHC (%)

33.70 ± 0.70

33.51 ± 0.66

0.211(NS)

Biochemical parameters:

 

CRP (mg/l)

2.9±0.42

0.91±0.31

0.041

  Fasting blood glucose (mg/dl)

98±19

82±8

0.013

Total cholesterol (mg/dl)

200±33

179±35

<0.001

Triglycerides (mg/dl)

175±50

118±52

<0.001

HDL cholesterol (mg/dl)

38±4

45±7

<0.001

LDL cholesterol (mg/dl)

131±29

107±28

<0.001

Serum creatinine (mg/dl)

1.0 ± 0.2

0.9 ± 0.1

0.076 (NS)

 Serum urea (mg/dl)

31.4 ± 6.8

28.8 ± 4.8

0.093 (NS)

AST (U/L)

21.4 ± 5.0

31.4 ± 7.1

<0.001

ALT (U/L)

20.8 ± 12.0

33.5 ± 10.1

<0.001

Alkaline phosphatase(U/L)

73.5 ± 18.6

69.7 ± 22.9

0.155 (NS)

Values represented in the table are the mean ± SD; Student's t-test; NS: Non-Significant; HDL: High-density lipoprotein. LDL: Low-density lipoprotein.

The mean and standard deviation of the studied biochemical parameters for Madgha users and their controls are also presented in table (2).  On the contrary to our controls, Madgha consumers had significantly higher levels of C reactive protein, total serum cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, and higher fasting blood glucose levels.  In addition tohigher levels of serum AST and ALT. However,the other biochemical parameters as serum creatinine, serum urea, and alkaline phosphatase were not significantly different between Madgha consumers and their controls.

Nearly two-thirds of the users (64.4%) consumed Madgha for more than 6 years (Figure 1). And as shown in figure 2 there were 16 subjects consumed Madgha > 6 times per day.

Finding in the below table illustrated that there was a statistically significant positive correlation between duration of Madgha intake and each of the following: Total white cell count (P=0.001), platelet count (P= 0.008) and level of CRP in users' blood (P=0.0312). While there were no significant correlations between the duration of Madgha intake and the other assessed parameters in this table (Table 3).

Table 3: Pearson Correlation between duration of Madgha intake and some parameters.

Variable

rho

 P-value

RBCs Count (1012/L)

0.083

0.063 (NS)

Hemoglobin gm/dL

-0.177

0.311 (NS)

WBCs (109/L)

0.712

0.001

Platelet Count (109/L)

0.477

0.008

PCV (%)

-0.073

0.841 (NS)

MCV (fl)

-0.062

0.743 (NS)

MCH (pg)

-0.271

0.062 (NS)

MCHC (%)

-0.221

0.071 (NS)

CRP (mg/l)

0.526

0.0312

Fasting Blood Glucose (mg/dL)

-0.161

0.352 (NS)

Total cholesterol (mg/dl)

0.331

0.075 (NS)

Triglycerides (mg/dl)

0.531

0.055 (NS)

AST (U/L)

0.322

0.062 (NS)

ALT (U/L)

0.431

0.078 (NS)

ALP (U/L)

-0.158

0.361 (NS)

Serum Urea (mg/dl)

0.546

0.065 (NS)

Serum Creatinine (mg/dl)

0.246

0.152 (NS)

NS: Non-Significant.

Discussion

Smokeless tobacco is adeep-rootedhuman practice like smoking tobacco. The adverse effect of tobacco products on human systems has been well known for long-lasting years. We conducted the present study to find out whether Madgha causedunfavourable effects on selected hematological and biochemical parameters or not in a group of apparently healthy individuals.

Similar tothe previous studies, the present study observed an increase in total leukocyte count among Madgha users, especially with  the long use duration, such an increase might take in consideration the occurrence of tissues inflammation and damages, alsothe nicotine present in smokeless tobacco products speeds up the occurrence of leucocytosis [13-17]. The tobacco-specific nitrosamines present in ST (The most potent carcinogen among the known 28 carcinogens) altered the metabolicstat gradually leading to an increase in the tissue inflammation, apoptosis, and differentblood cell damage.

Like what detected in Mukherjee R, et al.(2013) study, ST usershad higher levels of neutrophils and lower levels of lymphocytes and monocytes in their blood, the observed increase in neutrophil count indicated the initiation of the inflammatory reactions [15].

C-reactive protein (CRP) is one of the primary acute-phase proteins promptly elevated in responseto human tissue inflammations. A high-level of CRP refers to the occurrence of an acute infection. It is measured to monitor the disease progress. 18 Our study agrees with other studies that reported ST is accompanied by higher CRP, and other inflammatory markers [19,20].

The undesirable effects of Madgha intake on lipid profile were seenamong ourST users, the total serum cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol levels were found high in the ST-users group compared to the non -users group. Studies on the use of Gutka conducted among the Indian population showed a similar negative effect on serum cholesterol and fat metabolism [21]. Nicotine released from non-smoked tobacco consumptionstimulates catecholamine secretion that may have raised blood cholesterol levels and increased the risk of expanding lipid-related disorders [22].

A significant increase in the mean value of fasting blood glucose levels was noted among the user participants, and this result is accepted by Jaganmohan P, et al. (2011) study [21]. Our findings supported the fact that nicotine in tobacco may contribute in reducing insulin sensitivity in human tissue [23,24].

Smokeless tobacco products have high fatal systemic toxicity.8 So, the prevention of ST lowers many causes of non-communicable morbidity and mortality.

Study limitations

The small sample size of the current study may have had an impact on the clarityof the results, so theresultscould not be generalized to the total population of the study site.No measurement of the quantity of nicotine or its metabolitewas done for the users due to the unavailability of lab resources at the time of the study.

Conclusion

The consumption of Madgha might have harmed both hematological (viz. increase in white cell count, neutrophil percentages, ESR, and a decrease in the percentage of lymphocytes and monocytes) and biochemical parameters (viz. increase in CRP levels, total lipid profile, and blood glucose levels). A significant positive correlation was detected between the duration of Madgha intake and each of the following parameters: Total white cell count, platelet count, and level of CRP. Awareness is immensely needed to stop Madgha's usage and safeguard people's health in Aswan.  Our findings might help in theconduction of an awareness campaign that covers the health hazards of ST products to the users in Upper Egypt, who consumeMadgha as an inexpensive alternative to tobacco smoking. Long-term follow-up studiesare required with detailed measures of tobacco use to determine whether Madgha is a risk factor for most of non-communicabledisorders.

References

  1. Borland R, Cooper J, McNeill A, O'Connor R, Cummings KM (2011) Trends in beliefs about the harmfulness and use of stop-smoking medications and smokeless tobacco products among cigarettes smokers: Findings from the ITC four-country survey. Harm Reduct 8:21.
  2. Jensen K, Nizamutdinov D, Guerrier M, Afroze S, Dostal D, et al. (2012) General mechanisms of nicotine-induced fibrogenesis. FASEB J 26:4778-4487.
  3. Leon ME, Lugo A, Boffetta P, Gilmore A, Ross H, et al.(2016) Smokeless tobacco use in Sweden and other 17 European countries. Eur J Public Health 26:817-821.
  4. Ali SB, Eid RM (2017) Effect of Smokeless Tobacco (Madgha) on Spirometry. Int J Adv Biomed 2: 35-37.
  5. World Health Organization (2009) Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Egypt Country Report.
  6. Sharma P, Murthy P, Shivhare P (2015) Nicotine quantity and packaging disclosure in smoked and smokeless tobacco products in India. Indian J Pharmacal 47:440-443.
  7. Sinha DN, Palipudi KM, Gupta PC, Singhal S, Ramasundarahettige C, et al. (2014) Smokeless tobacco use: A meta-analysis of risk and attributable mortality estimates for India. Indian JCancer 2014; 51: S73-S77.
  8. Biswas S, Manna K, Das U, Khan A, Pradhan A, et al. (2015) Smokeless tobacco consumption impedes metabolic, cellular, apoptotic and systemic stress pattern: A study on Government employees in Kolkata. India Sci Rep 5:18284.
  9. Hossain MS, Kypri K, Rahman B, Arslan I, Akter S, et al. (2014) Prevalence and correlates of smokeless tobacco consumption among married women in rural Bangladesh. PLoS One 9:e84470.
  10. Khan MM, Tandon SN, Khan MT, Pandey US (2008) A Comparative study of cigarette and bidi smoking on total red blood cell count, packed cell volume and hemoglobin concentration. J Biol Chem Res 25:17-20.
  11. Asif M, Karim S, Umar Z, Malik A, Ismail T, et al. (2013) Effect of cigarette smoking based on hematological parameters: comparison between male smokers and nonsmokers. Turk J Biochem 38:75-80.
  12. Jyothirmayi B, Kaviarasi S, William E (2013) Study of glycated hemoglobin in chronic cigarette smokers. IJPCR 5: 4-6.
  13. Bain B, Bates I, Laffan M, Lewis S (2016) Dacie and Lewis Practical Haematology.(12thedtn), Elsevier, United Kingdom.
  14. Yasmin S, Stuti S, Rastogi N, Das J (2007) Negative impact of gutkha on certain blood parameters of Swiss mice. Bulletin of Pure & Appl Sci 26:75-79.
  15. Mukherjee R, Chatterjee A (2013) Assessment of the effects of smoking and consuming Gutka on selected hematological and biochemical parameters: a study on healthy adult males of Hazaribag, Jharkhand. Int J Pharm Chem Biol Sci 3:1172-1178.
  16. Shukla AK, Khaitan T, Gupta P, Naik SR (2019) Smokeless tobacco and its adverse effects on hematological parameters: A cross-sectional study. Adv Prev Med.
  17. Shenwai MR, Aundhakar NV (2012) Effect of cigarette smoking on various hematological parameters in young male smokers. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res 5:386-392.
  18. Tonstad S, Cowan JL (2009) C-reactive protein as a predictor of disease in smokers and former smokers: a review. Int J Clin Pract 63:1634-1641.
  19. Ouchi N, Kihara S, Funahashi T (2003) Reciprocal association of C-reactive protein with adiponectin in the bloodstream and adipose tissue. Circulation 107:671-674.
  20. Black S, Kushner I, Samols D (2004) C-reactive protein. J Biol Chem 279:48487-48490.
  21. Jaganmohan P, Phaninanatha A (2011) Studies on changes in hematological and biochemical parameters in smokeless tobacco (Gutka) chewing auto drivers in Nellore district of Andhra Pradesh, India J Nat Appl Sci3:106-107.
  22. Balhara YP (2012) Tobacco and metabolic syndrome. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 16: 81-87.
  23. Elias‏son B, Mero N, Taskinen MR, Smith U (1997) The insulin resistance syndrome and postprandial lipid intolerance in smokers. Atherosclerosis 129: 79-88.
  24. Morgan TM, Crawford L, Stoller A, Toth D, Yeo KT, et al. (2004) Acute effects of nicotine on serum glucose insulin growth hormone and cortisol in healthy smokers. Metabolism 53:578-582.
scroll up