Systemic Ivermctine plus Inralesional Antimony Compared with Antimony Alone in Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis View PDF

*Ahmed Abdulhussein Kawen
Department Of Venereology And Dermatology, College Of Medicine, University Of Thi-Qar, Iraq

*Corresponding Author:
Ahmed Abdulhussein Kawen
Department Of Venereology And Dermatology, College Of Medicine, University Of Thi-Qar, Iraq
Email:ahmedpath@yahoo.com

Published on: 2020-05-20

Abstract

Background: About (1.5 million) cases of CL annually all-over the world, there are many treatment strategies are applicable; some are topical other is systemically given
Rationale: Many management modalities are of good final result, but the durable effect might be of golden hope for the patients.
Aim: Estimate the effectiveness of intralesional sodium Stibo-gluconate (ILSSG) augmented by orally administered Ivermctine to decrease the number of injection sessions and its complications, increase the efficacy of pentavalent antimony, shorten the therapy duration and minimize or prevent the resultant scar.
Methodology: An evaluative prospective study had been conducted from September 2018 to the march of 2020 to recruit eighty nine patients with typical cutaneous leishmaniasis, who visiting the outpatients of dermatology and Venereology in Al-Hussein Teaching hospital- Thi-Qar province. After full consent, two groups, well crossly matched regarding age, gender, the type and size of the lesions: group a received ILSSG plus oral Ivermctine weekly and group B who received ILSSG weekly alone.
Results: high rate of complete response in group A in six week (81.39%) compared to 1st week (2.23%) when it compared with group B which was with very good response rate in 6th week (67.39%) while no response in 1st week. The complete response A and B was relatively equal (93.02%) and (91.3%) respectively in third month. The highest rate of partial response was observed in the first week 16(37.20%) and then reduced in the third week (27.90%) and sixth week (16.27%) while the percentage of reduction of group B- partial response in was higher than group A as a compared group. The group A -poor responses were (60.46%), (9.30%) and (2.32%) in the 1st, 3rd, 6th week respectively, which showing obvious decrement, while group B -poor responses were high especially in the week (97.82%) and (43.47%) first and third week respectively. There was significant statistical difference in response rate within the 1st and 3rd weeks of follow-up, while 6th week and 3rd months which showing the differences in response rate.
Conclusion: Addition of Ivermctine as Combined type of treatment show early good and partial response than ILSSG alone with significant durable effect.

Keywords

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis; ILSSG; Ivermctine; Thi-Qar

Introduction

A different leishmaniasis species causing cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), which labeled asking macrophages parasitic infestation, for about sixty percent by L. major & forty percent by L. tropical where had been as the most prevalent Iraqi species in as detected by PCR technique [1]. WHO estimate about (1.5 million) cases of CL annually all-over the world, also (350 million) individuals nominated as a risky for CL disease acquiring in about (eighty eight) endemic countries, Iraq one of them, in which CL might create a health emergency and one of the main health problem [2]. Even though It seemly to be disease of self-limiting pattern, but, there were many nagement modalities with different durations, the disease also may lasting months or years. Main complications are secondary bacterial infection, cosmetically important sites as the face with risk of serious disfigurement, immune suppression and psychological impact on patient [3]. Many treatment strategies are applicable; some are systemically given such sodium Stibo-gluconate but main limitation are systemic toxicities, painful injections, and case resistance [4,5] ketoconazole is another example of systemic agents, that used to overcoming and or to avoid adverse effect of the 1st systematic regimen [6,7]. Zinc sulfate is another choice of treatment [8] and further option is the Daps one [9]. Limited form of CL is preferably to treated by either Promomycin (topical) [10] or Trichlore Acitic Acid (50%) [11], or by Cryotherapy (as physical methods) [12] cauterization and application of heat and [13] or sodium Stibo-gluconate (intra-lesion) injection of [14], 2%- Zinc sulfate [15], although the sodium Stibo-gluconate (intra-lesion)-ILSSG is the main role of CL management stratrigy. But the tendency for the systematic treatment not always, it indicated in some situation such treatment forimmunly-suppressed patient; >4 lesions of size substantially more than1 cm or individual lesion(s) measuring equal or more than five cm; regional lymphadenopathy(hugely enlarged, of the, facial, auricular, genitalial mucosal involvement, skin of fingers or toes, or overlying joint skin [16-18], pain, swelling and erythema decrease in dramatic way for the sessions of intra-lesional therapy [19]. In children this type of treatment might be problematic. For that reason, the present study was designed to estimate the effectiveness of inralesional sodium Stibo-gluconate augmented by orally administered Ivermctine to decrease the number of injection sessions and its complications, increase the efficacy of pentavalent antimony, shorten the therapy duration and minimize or prevent the resultant scar.

Patients and Methods

An evaluative prospective study had been conducted from September 2018 to the march of 2020 to recruit eighty nine patients with typical cutaneous leishmaniasis, who visiting the outpatients of dermatology and venereology in Al-Hussein Teaching hospital, Thi-Qar province and Merjan teaching hospital. Where the diagnosis of each case based on the clinical examination, direct smear and a histopathological examination for the query cases in whom the smear was negative. A full verbal consent had been taken from patients, and full ethical consideration was on a values implemented carefully, where explanation was done to each patient or their next of kin (for children) regarding their disease and it's natural history, prognosis, possible complication and available treatment options. Lastly, a formal consent was taken from each participant. A questionnaire for demographic and clinical data was designed to include the patients age by years, gender, address emphasizing on whether they live in rural or urban areas, number of lesions and it's sites, duration, any previous systemic, topical or intra-lesional therapy taken, past medical, surgical and drug history specially allergy to the drug used in this study. An examination was done to evaluate each lesion regarding the size in centimeters, indurations, color, whether it is of dry or wet type, any signs of secondary bacterial infection and regional lymphadenopathy. Exclusion criteria: systemic pentavalent antimonies drugs patient (according to its indications) chronic debilitated patients, <5 years aged children, lactating or pregnant women.

Design and Work Field

The diagnosis was established by history, examination and The sample was divided into two groups, well crossly matched regarding age, gender, the type and size of the lesions: group A received inralesional sodium Stibo-gluconate (0.1ml per 1 cm² of 100mg per ml vial) weekly plus oral Ivermctine 200 ug/kg given weekly and group B whom received intra-lesional sodium Stibo-gluconate (0.1ml per 1 cm² of 100mg per ml vial) weekly alone. A photograph was taken each visit and the lesion's dimensions, color and indurations were recorded, the following parameters were checked at zero time then weekly until healing which are lesion size, color, indurations and ulceration, also the patients were asked and examined for any possible adverse drug reactions. Weekly, the patients evaluated according to the following criteria: cure was defined as no indurations, reappearance of epidermal creases and no ulceration or cru station, partial improvement was defined as decrease the lesion's size, flattening, change of color from bright red to dusky red or brown but no epidermal creases seen, no and poor responses were defined as no change in color, size or indurations. Also, a biochemical assessment of all participants was conducted at zero time, and then at first week and monthly thereafter in form of complete blood count, liver function test and renal function test. Chi-square test was used in analysis of the results using SPSS program version 25 had been used, where P<0.05 consider as significant.

Results

A total of 89 patients were enrolled in the study and were divided into two groups; group A included 43 patients of them 19 males and 24 females with total number of lesions was 96, while group B included 46 patients (24 males and 22 females) and the total number of lesions was 105, all were treated and evaluated weekly. The mean patients' age was 27±12 years for group A and 29±14 years in group B, while the mean disease duration was 1.9±05, 1.7±06 months for group A, B respectively. The most observed clinical presentation was plaque type in both groups (60.41% in group A and 49.52% in group B), followed by nodular type (25% in group A and 30.47% in group B) and, lastly, the popular type (14.58% in group A and 20% in group B) with no significant differences (P=0.261). 57% of patients had more than one lesion. The most common site of involvement was the face in both groups (35.41% in group A and 39.04% in B) followed by lower and upper limbsas a less common site lastly trunk was the uncommon site for CL in both groups, there was no significant statistical difference where P>0.05 and it was equal to 0.605 (Table 1).

Table 1: Demography and lesions character of two comparative groups

Participant characters

Group A (trial) N=43

Group B (control) N= 46

P. value

Average age (year, mean ± SD)

27±12

29±14

NS

Duration of lesions (mean ± SD)

1.9±0.5

1.7±0.6

NS

Gender

 

Male

19 (44.18%)

24 (52.17%)

0.451

Female

24 (55.81%)

22 (47.83%)

Total

43 (100%)

46 (100%)

 

Site of lesions

 

Facial

34 (35.41%)

41 (39.04%)

0.605

Upper limbs

25 (26.04%)

26 (24.76%)

Lower limbs

21 (21.87%)

24 (22.85%)

Trunk

16 (16.66%)

14 (9.52%)

Total

96 (100%)

105 (100%)

 

Clinical presentation

 

Plaque

58 (60.41%)

52 (49.52%)

0.291

Nodule

24 (25%)

32 (30.47%)

Papule

14 (14.58%)

21 (20%)

Total

96 (100%)

105 (100%)

 

Where: **P.value ≤ 0.05 mean high Significant

Weekly the patient was evaluated (till healing) for complete, partial and poor responses to the given therapy. The present study recorded that high rate of complete response in group A in six week 35(81.39%) and fewer rates was in one week 1(2.23%) when as compared with group B which recorded high rate in six week 31(67.39%) while did not show any response in one week. The complete response in both group A and B was relatively equal 40(93.02%) and 42(91.3%) respectively in third month. The highest rate of partial response was observed in the first week 16(37.20%) and then reduced in the third week 12(27.90%) and sixth week 7(16.27%) while the percentage of reduction of group B-partial response in was higher than group A as a compared group. The group A poor responses were 26 (60.46%) 4(9.30%) and 1(2.32%) in the 1st, 3rd, and 6th week respectively, which showing obvious decrement, while group B poor responses were high especially in the week 45(97.82%) and 20(43.47%) first and third week respectively. There was significant statistical difference in response rate with in the 1st and 3rd weeks of follow-up, while 6th week and 3rd months did not showing this differences (Table 2) (Figure 1).

Table 2: Percentage of response to therapy in both study groups (A and B) in 1st, 3rd and 6th week and 3rd month.

Response

Week 1

Week 3

Week 6

Month 3

 

Group A N=43

Group B N=46

Group A N=43

Group B N=46

Group A N=43

Group B N=46

Group A N=43

Group B N=46

Complete

1 (2.23%)

0 (0.0%)

27 (62.79%)

8 (17.39%)

35 (81.39%)

31 (67.39%)

40 (93.02%)

42 (91.3%)

Partial

16 (37.20%)

1 (2.17%)

12 (27.90%)

18 (39.13%)

7 (16.27%)

12 (26.08%)

2 (4.65 %)

3 (6.52%)

poor

26 (60.64%)

45(97.83%)

4 (9.30%)

20(43.47%)

1(2.32%)

3(6.52%)

1 (2.32%)

1 (2.17%)

Test of sig.

 FE= 19.241

Chi square =22.105

Chi square =2.460

FE= 0.148

P. Value

0.0001**

0.0001**

0.292

0.929

 

Discussion

The pentavalent antimony is the most accepted treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis [20], but the need for many painful injections in addition to high cost, which is problematic particularly in children which leading to large number of defaulters that increasing failure rate that leading to resistance emergence [21,22]. The seeking for combination and augmentation of treatment was necessary for decreasing the treatment sessions number with the persevering cure rate either(similar, or higher) that shortening the duration of disease, secondary bacterial infection risk and destruction of local tissue and in turn ultimately minimizing scar or preventing scar formation. The augmented treatment may be seem higher costs than monotherapy in disease of short term courses, but if appropriately used, it can causing significant savings such as lower treatment failure rate, lower case fatality ratio and fewer side effects than monotherapy, slower development of resistance and consequently, less money needed for the development of new drugs [25]. In the current study the CL patient were crossly matched well regarding their age, gender, duration of disease, site of the lesion and finally clinical presentation to avoid the role of confounding effects of some factors and also to minimize bias, response was categorized into complete (full) , partial and poor response according to the clinical criteria while the durable classification was according to mention nominated weeks and months in the guidelines, weekly follow up the patient was evaluated( till healing) for complete, partial and poor responses to the given therapy. The present study recorded that high rate of complete response in group A in six week 35(81.39%) compared to 1st week 1(2.23%) when as compared with group B which was with very good response rate in 6th week 31(67.39%) while no response in 1st week. The complete response A and B was relatively equal 40(93.02%) and 42(91.3%) respectively in third month. The highest rate of partial response was observed in the first week 16(37.20%) and then reduced in the third week 12(27.90%) and sixth week 7(16.27%) while the percentage of reduction of group B-partial response in was higher than group A as a compared group. The group A poor responses were 26(60.46%) 4(9.30%) and 1(2.32%) in the 1st, 3rd, 6th week respectively, which showing obvious decrement, while group B -poor responses were high especially in the week 45(97.82%) and 20(43.47%) first and third week respectively. There was significant statistical difference in response rate within the 1st and 3rd weeks of follow-up, while 6th week and 3rd months which showing the differences in response rate which was higher than other studies that measuring the efficacy of single line of treatment such Navara et al. meta-analysis of systematic review [26] for IL-SSG efficacy for gathered (5679) patients, with 75% a global efficacy of (68–82% - Confidence Interval 95%), which was comparable to results of antimony parenteral treatment of New World for with [27] and also comparable Old World-systematic reviews local treatments by other strategies [28-30]. While for the single use of Ivermectin efficacy in comparison to other drugs (in-vitro & in-vivo) Ivermctine lead to viable promastigotes number reduction sharply in vitro. The Ivermctine efficacy was higher than other comparative group rather than ILSSG [31]. The results concluded that the efficacy of Ivermctine was higher than drugs in killing the parasites in vitro and by subcutaneous inoculation, in term of durable response our study was comparable to Kadir et al. study that show cure rate one month post treatment with Ivermctine were excellent (100%), followed by pentostam 70%, followed by other such berenil (60%), metronidazole 50%, and amphotericin B (50%) [31]. Mandy et al study focusing in an important thing that, in vivo &in vitro activities of Ivermctine are achievable in a concentrations of clinically reachable depend on the pharmacokinetic studies in human done in healthy and parasitized patients, that explain the durable response [32].

Strength of the Study

  • 1st evaluative follow up study done for CL in Al-Nasiriyah.
  • Avoidance of confusing and biased factors among the comparative group that cofounding the response result
  • Studying of as a parameter for the prediction.

Limitations

Comparison with other local or systematic method of treatment.

Conclusion

Addition of Ivermctine as Combined type of treatment show early good and partial response than ILSSG alone with significant durable effect.

Recommendation

Usage of this combination can give good durable effect, if there's no contraindication for use of this augmented therapy.

References

  1. Al-Heany AR, Sharquie KE, Al-Najar SA, Noaimi AA (2014) Cutaneous leishmaniasis: Comparative techniques for diagnosis. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 13: 33-37.
  2. Kent VA, Afonso K, Marsden R (2016) IA case report of diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis in resistance to Sodium stibogluconate (Sbb). Am J Biomed Sci 4: 444-454.
  3. Gonzalez U, Pinart RL, Alvar J (2008) Interventions for old world cutaneous leishmaniasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8: CD005067.
  4. Lianet M (2009) Current treatment of leishmaniasis: A Review. Open Antimicrob Agents 1: 9-19.
  5. Croft SL, Coombs GH (2003) Leishmaniasis–current chemotherapy and recent advances in the search for novel drugs. Trends Parasitol19: 502-508.
  6. Emad M, Hayati F, Fallahzadeh MK, Namazi MR (2011) Superior efficacy of oral fluconazole 400 mg daily versus oral fluconazole 200 mg daily in the treatment of cutaneous leishmania major infection: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 64: 606-608.
  7. El?Sayed M, Anwar AE (2010) Intralesional sodium stibogluconate alone or its combination with either intramuscular sodium stibogluconate or oral ketoconazole in the treatment of localized cutaneousleishmaniasis: a comparative study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 24: 335-340.
  8. Sharquie KE, Noaimi AA, Al-Salam WS (2016) Treatment of Acute Cutaneous Leishmaniasis by Oral Zinc Sulfate and Oral Ketocanazole Singly and in Combination. J Cosm Dermatolo Sci Appli 6: 105-115.
  9. Al?Mutairi N, Alshiltawy M, Khalawany ME, Joshi A, Eassa BI, et al. (2009) Treatment of Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis with dapsone, itraconazole, cryotherapy, and imiquimod, alone and in combination. Intern J Dermatol 48: 862-869.
  10. Ben Salah A, Ben Messaoud N, Guedri E, Zaatour A, Ben Alaya N, et al. (2013) Topical Paromomycin with or without Gentamicin for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. N Engl J Med 368: 524-532.
  11. Jaffary F, Nilforoushzadeh MA, Siadat A, Haftbaradaran E, Ansari N, et al. (2016) A comparison between the effects of glucantime, topical trichloroacetic acid 50% plus glucantime, and fractional carbon dioxide laser plus glucantime on cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions. Dermatol Res Pract 2016: 6462804.
  12. Negera E, Gadisa E, Hussein J, Engers H, Kuru T, et al. (2012) Treatment response of cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmaniaaethiopica tocryotherapy and generic sodium stibogluconate from patients in Silti, Ethiopia. Trans Royal Soc Trop Med Hyg 106: 496-503.
  13. KE Sharquie, SA Al-Mashhadani, Noaimi AA, Al-Zoubaidy WB (2015) Microwave Therapy: New Treatment for Cutaneous Leishmaniasus. Our Dermatol Online 6: 125-129.
  14. Giannakoulas NF, Speletas E, Karanikas V, Damani HA (2016) Hepatosplenic T-Cell Lymphoma in visceral leishmaniasis young girl. Am J Biomed Sci 4: 19-24.
  15. Bafghi AF, Noorbala M, Noorbala MT, Aghabagheri M (2014) Anti leishmanial effect of Zinc Sulphate on the viability of leishmania tropica and L. major Promastigotes. Jundishapur J Microbiol 7: e11192.
  16. Murray HW, Berman JD, Davies CR, Saravia NG (2005) Advances in leishmaniasis. Lancet 366: 1561-1577.
  17. Aronson N, Herwaldt BL, Libman M, Pearson R, Lopez-Velez R, et al. (2016) Diagnosis and treatment of leishmaniasis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH). Clin Infect Dis 63: 1539-1557.
  18. Abramowicz M, Rizack MA, Goodstein D, Faucard A, Hansten PD, et al. (2007) Drugs for parasitic infections. Med Lett Drugs Ther 5: e6.
  19. Bolognia JL, Schaffer JV, Cerroni LC (2018) Dermatology. (4th edtn), Elsevier, Netherlands.
  20. Bumb RA, Mehta RD, Ghiya BC, Jakhar R, Prasad N , et al. (2010) Efficacy of short-duration (twice weekly) intralesional sodium stibogluconate in treatment of cutaneous Leishmaniasis in India. Br J Dermatol 163: 854-858.
  21. Báfica A, Oliveira F, Freitas LA, Nascimento EG, Barral A (2003) American CutaneousLeishmaniasi unresponsive to antimonial drugs: Successful treatment using combination of N-MethilglucanmineAntimoniate plus pentoxifylline. Int J Dermatol 42: 203-207.
  22. Ponte-Sucre A, Gamarro F, Dujardin JC, Barrett MP, López-Vélez R (2017) Drug resistance and treatment failure in leishmaniasis: A 21st century challenge. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11: e0006052.
  23. Al-Natour SH (2009) Update in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Family Community Med 16: 41-47.
  24. Kandil E (1973) Treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with trimethoprim\sulfamethoxazole combination, Dermatologica 146: 303-309.
  25. Bozic I, Reiter JG, Allen B, Antal T, Chatterjee K, et al. (2013) Evolutionary dynamics of cancer in response to targeted combination therapy. Elife 2: 747.
  26. Brito NC, Rabello A, Cota GF (2017) Efficacy of pentavalent antimoniate intralesional infiltration therapy for cutaneous leishmaniasis: A systematic review. PLoS One 12: e0184777.
  27. Tuon FF, Amato VS, Graf ME, Siqueira AM, Nicodemo AC, et al. (2008) Treatment of New World cutaneous leishmaniasis-a systematic review with a meta-analysis. Int J Dermatol 47: 109-124.
  28. Kim DH, Chung HJ, Bleys J, Ghohestani RF (2009) Is paromomycin an effective and safe treatment against cutaneous leishmaniasis? A meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3: e381.
  29. Cardona-Arias JA, Velez ID, Lopez-Carvajal L (2015) Efficacy of thermotherapy to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. PLoS One 10: e0122569.
  30. Lopez-Carvajal L, Cardona-Arias JA, Zapata-Cardona MI, Sanchez-Giraldo V, Velez ID (2016) Efficacy of cryotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis: meta-analyses of clinical trials. BMC Infect Dis 16: 360.
  31. Kadir MA, Aswad HS, Al-Samarai AM, Al-Mula GA (2009) Comparison between the efficacy of ivermectin and other drugs in treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Iraqi J Vet Sci 23: 175-180.
  32. Juarez M, Schcolnik-Cabrera A, Dueñas-Gonzalez A (2018) The multitargeted drug ivermectin: from an antiparasitic agent to a repositioned cancer drug. Am J Cancer Res 8: 317-331.
scroll up